📈 India's #1 Share Price Target Analysis Platform
Share Target Price
Back to all funds
Small CapVSLarge Cap

Nippon India Small Cap Fund vs Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund

Side-by-side comparison of returns, risk, expenses, holdings and performance. AI-powered insights included.

3Y Return

20.63%

VS

3Y Return

12.12%

Chaliye, dekho, we are comparing two popular funds, Nippon India Small Cap Fund (Fund A) and Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund (Fund B). Fund A belongs to the Small Cap category, while Fund B is a Large Cap fund. We will analyze their performance, risk, and cost to help you decide which fund is better for long-term wealth creation.

ParameterANippon India Small Cap Fund - Direct Plan - GrowthBMotilal Oswal Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Fund HouseNippon IndiaMotilal Oswal
CategorySmall CapLarge Cap
NAV (₹)194.7713.56
AUM (₹ Cr)7.27 Lac Cr5.35 Lac Cr
Expense Ratio (%)0.64%0.82%
RiskometerVery HighVery High
Volatility18.6612.29
Sharpe Ratio0.760.46
1 Year Return (%)5.69%-1.96%
3 Year Return (%)20.63%12.12%
5 Year Return (%)21.91%12.11%
Since Launch (%)23.95%14.83%
Min SIP (₹)500500
Min Lumpsum (₹)10001000
Launch Date3 January 201312 February 2024
Exit LoadNilNil
Fund ManagerAmber Singhania; Kinjal Desai; Samir Rachh (9.4 years yrs)Niket Shah (3.5 years yrs)
BenchmarkNifty Smallcap 250 TRINifty 50
Top 3 HoldingsHDFC Bank Ltd. (1.89%), Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd. (1.76%), Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (1.67%)HDFC Bank Ltd. (8.5%), ICICI Bank Ltd. (7.8%), Reliance Industries Ltd. (6.9%)
Asset AllocationEquity: 97.17% | CD: 0.21%Equity: 96.00% | T-Bills: 4.00%
Portfolio Turnover32%26%

🤖 AI Verdict – Which is Better?

Haan, based on 3Y return, expense ratio, and risk, we think Fund A is a better bet for long-term wealth creation. Its 3Y return is 20.63%, which is significantly higher than Fund B's 12.12%. Moreover, Fund A's expense ratio is lower at 0.64% compared to Fund B's 0.82%. Although both funds have a Very High riskometer, we believe Fund A's higher returns justify the higher risk.

Why consider Nippon India Small Cap Fund?

  • Expense ratio: 0.64%
  • 3Y return: 20.63%
  • AUM: 7.27 Lac Cr
  • Sharpe Ratio: 0.76

Why consider Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund?

  • Expense ratio: 0.82%
  • 3Y return: 12.12%
  • AUM: 5.35 Lac Cr
  • Sharpe Ratio: 0.46

📈 SIP Suitability

Lekin, for a monthly SIP for 10+ years, we think Fund A is a better choice. Its consistency and return stability are higher compared to Fund B. Fund A's 1Y return is 5.69%, which is relatively stable, while Fund B's 1Y return is -1.96%. This means Fund A is less likely to fall significantly in a short period, making it a better option for SIP investors.

⚠️ Risk & Cost Analysis

Sach ye hai, when it comes to risk and cost, Fund A and Fund B have some differences. Fund A has a higher riskometer and volatility, but its Sharpe ratio is higher at 0.76 compared to Fund B's 0.46. This means Fund A offers better risk-adjusted returns. Additionally, Fund A's expense ratio is 0.64%, which is lower than Fund B's 0.82%. Overall, we think Fund A offers better risk-adjusted returns at a lower cost.

📊 Portfolio Diversification

Chaliye, dekho, let's compare the asset allocation and top holdings of both funds. Fund A has a higher equity allocation of 97.17%, while Fund B has a relatively stable asset allocation with 96% equity and 4% T-Bills. However, Fund B's top holdings, including HDFC Bank Ltd., ICICI Bank Ltd., and Reliance Industries Ltd., are highly concentrated, increasing sector risk. Fund A's top holdings, including HDFC Bank Ltd., Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd., and Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., are less concentrated, making its portfolio more diversified.

SIP Calculator – Compare Growth Potential

Nippon India Small Cap Fund

1991813.86

@20.6% annual return (3Y)

Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund

1170031.49

@12.1% annual return (3Y)

*Projected returns are illustrative based on historical 3‑year returns. Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (Comparison)

Q1: Which fund gives better returns in the long run?

Based on 5Y returns, Fund A gives better returns with a 21.91% return compared to Fund B's 12.11% return. Similarly, Fund A's 3Y return is also higher at 20.63% compared to Fund B's 12.12% return.

Q2: Is the higher risk fund worth it?

While Fund A has a higher riskometer, its Sharpe ratio is higher at 0.76 compared to Fund B's 0.46. This means Fund A offers better risk-adjusted returns. However, we must note that Fund A's volatility is higher at 18.66 compared to Fund B's 12.29. So, it's essential to consider your risk tolerance before investing in Fund A.

Q3: Which fund is more cost-effective?

Based on the expense ratio, Fund A is more cost-effective with a 0.64% expense ratio compared to Fund B's 0.82% expense ratio. This means you'll pay less in management fees if you invest in Fund A.

Mahendra Maurya

Mahendra Maurya

6+ Years in Banking, Wealth Management & Financial Services

Founder & Author of ShareTargetPrice.in. 6+ years in Banking, Wealth Management & Financial Services.

📊 Author & Founder at Share Target Price

⚠️ Disclaimer: Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. AI-generated insights are based solely on historical data and do not constitute investment advice. Please consult your SEBI-registered financial advisor.